Nezbit wrote:
Picco14 wrote:
Questions that I have always asked myself and that I am trying to resolve...
I think the problem is that Picco14 has asked these questions before and still hasn't gotten an answer. I know that he has asked the question on image stretching before.
....
I would think that answering a few questions in the hope of getting some new themes would be worth the effort.
Indeed, Picco14 has asked that before. And I agree, an answer from Jorge might be helpful, any answer, even if only to say 'Not on my watch'.
And some good new themes certainly would help too. The default ones certainly look terribly dated.
Nezbit wrote:
... I think themes are what has attracted a lot of customers.
In the - now more and more distant - past, yes, I'm sure. Now, they're much less of a factor I'm equally sure.
Nezbit wrote:
Anyone who is running Windows 2000 and earlier (why would you even bother) obviously has little interest in themes or any other eye candy. They could simply choose not to install more complex themes if their systems can't handle them or they don't like eye candy.
I'm afraid I have to say that those are rather presumptuous statements. There are a lot of people who still use very dated hardware for any number of reasons, e.g. financial ones, or they're happy with what they have and don't see the need to get more modern hardware, etc. Also, a lot of people prefer running an older OS - Win XP seems to be the most popular one, but I've come across Win 98 even though that is really rather sad I think, but then for some it's a matter of sentimental attachment or nostalgia. In any of these cases we cannot simply assume that such people have little or no interest in themes or eye-candy.
Nezbit wrote:
There are still artists creating themes for WindowBlinds, visual styles for Windows 10 and 11, and some interesting skins for Rainmeter. They have some very nice, not elaborate, animations that in no way would tax a system. Many people are still interested in eye candy.
Windowblinds/Visual Styles is one big pile of manure that can seriously f**k with your system IME, and most of the skins are much of the same. Not that it's still a vast number of new ones. Rainmeter, yes, interesting, and some interesting skins, though visually a bit limited by the vector gfx. But again, very much a minority interest. And you contradict yourself there, now claiming 'many' people are still interested in eye-candy. It's a diminishing interest. It even applies in Linux - with some very long-standing Linux users going so far as to do a manual install that lets them boot straight into the Terminal (aka the Bash shell). Being a fairly long time predominantly Linux user myself, I love Bash and use it a lot too. (But then I go back with it, having used a native version under OS/2, its 'parent' the Bourne shell under various *nix and BSD systems, and Bash under early Linux, which I explored fairly frequently from early days.)
Nezbit wrote:
With the lack of interest in themes and fixing the minor long standing bugs in Winstep Xtreme, I have started to move away from the program. For less than the price of Winstep Xtreme I have been able to customize my system as much as I want. My system is seven years old and I have seven programs running in the background without any slowdowns or problems. I still have a shelf running in the background, but I don't use it very often.
Well good for you if that floats your boat. I wouldn't like using Windows, when I have to use it, without Winstep. However, I have my own themes that are minimalist, and no anims of any kind except the recycler mod (an old 'hang-over' from my NeXT days).
Nezbit wrote:
I still really like Winstep Xtreme, and I hope that all the minor problems get solved and more themes are created. ... It's just that without [Jorge's] input, the quality of support suffers.
Yes, there are some old mainly minor issues that really need addressing, and the Taskbar does need a good bit of TLC, esp. the vertical one. More themes will come along bit by bit I suppose. Don't see though how in the absence of Jorge's input 'the quality of support suffers.'
Nezbit wrote:
2 Million quid???? I still can only afford 2 cents. I would add a smiley face but I guess the only eye candy that I don't like is Emoticons. The great thing about Windows is that you can customize it the way you like. It's too bad that option is starting to disappear in Linux. I remember when that was a selling point.
Well, I meant I expect to be paid that sum for my pronunciations.
Maybe I'm an optimist after all. Maybe in future I should just put a tiny fraction of a Bitcoin.
As for Emoticons, not keen on them either so they're disabled here. I do however find that proper smileys do have their use and been using them since the good old BBS days where they came into existence.
But have to disagree strongly that Windows is customizable the way you want. From way back it's always thrown obstacles into the way of that, and it's becoming less and less so with each new version. Just look for instance at the problems wrt the systray in Win 11!
Regarding Linux, it's reached a point where a) it doesn't really need customisation, and b) the majority of ordinary users wouldn't even want it. The majority just want everything just working straight 'out of the box' without having to do anything. Which in many respects is unfortunate of course.