Nezbit wrote:
Your thoughts on the future of Linux are interesting. Something certainly needs to happen to push Linux forward. A unified Desktop Environment might just be the answer. I think Windows 11, and what I have heard about Windows 12, might be just enough to push people elsewhere. I think the gaming community is also getting tired of what is happening with Windows.
A Unified DE would only be one first step - it would of course pre-suppose a (new) single Window Manager and complete new graphics sub-system etc. Also, to go further with this, Linux would need a single set of dependencies so that developers of third party apps wouldn't have to code separate versions for different distros. Furthermore, a new, single package distribution format would be essential, perhaps 7zip for instance. A central app register that made it simple for any user to keep track of and to uninstall any app would be handy as well. (I don't mean the mess we currently have with utilities like the Ubuntu 'Software' one, let alone the likes of 'Synaptic Package Manager'.)
All of this looks unlikely to be even possible to be achieved by a single distro of course - it would require the 'big 4, or 5' major distros to wholly co-operate, say Ubuntu, Fedora, Debian, OpenSuse - and to keep things pretty much under wraps for a time. The smaller distros IMO should be left to muddle on or preferably fall by the wayside. Nor could this be achieved with just volunteer coders - it would take a reasonably substantial core of salaried coders, project managers, and an over all head of project (with vision and drive).
Whether it would be possible - or perhaps even desirable - for Linux to continue wholly along the 'Free and Open Source' route with such an ambitious project is another question I think. My own feelings in this respect are somewhat ambivalent. On the one hand I certainly wholly support the concept of Open Source (and independent auditing of source!), but on the other hand whether it would really be feasible to allow such a project to be completely free - and I don't mean free of cost to the user here, I mean in the sense of freedom to change, use, distribute, whatever - would be highly debatable.
Nezbit wrote:
It was interesting to read today that Linux has overtaken Macs on Steam. It was thanks to the Steam Deck, but at least it is a start.
https://www.pcworld.com/article/2020796 ... ayers.htmlYes, and that doesn't seem to be the only place where Linux is overtaking or equalling Rotten Fruit Mac user base. Last time I checked it looked like all distros combined were pretty much head to head with Mac and set to overtake it. The only things that have been keeping the Rotten Fruit alive are on the one hand style and gadget 'freaks' and on the other, users of (mainly) Mac-exclusive music related apps.
Nezbit wrote:
The question is will the Linux community ever agree on anything? We’ve been hearing “This is the year of Linux” for how long? And if there ever is a unified DE, will it become another Windows or MacOS? Is the freedom to do what you want the thing that makes Linux what it is?
Alas, yes, agreement might be a problem in any future 'Unity Linux' project. But if all the almost myriad minor distros are simply ignored and left to rot as it were, it should be possible in the interest of moving forward.
As for the question of whether a unified Linux would ever become another Windows or macOS, let's start by looking at the past and present. Almost from the early days of Window Managers/DEs - one or two excepted like Windowmaker and Afterstep - Linux distros have been striving to be as Windows-like - or Mac-like in a few cases - as possible without actually becoming Windows or Mac, and in the more recent past they've all pretty much achieved it. Nowadays, most (Windows-like) DEs are a doddle to use by any half-intelligent Windows user (and conversely, the same applies to Mac). So, in a way, your question answers itself - we're already there, more or less. Alas. That is why a 'Unity Linux' needs to be completely inventive and innovative, new, a breeze of fresh air, even a bit revolutionary, to distinguish itself, yet at the same time to be at least as user-friendly as the present and easy to transition to this new system.
A Unified Linux would need to establish strong branding and identity (both in terms of the unity and the individual core distros) with an emphasis on user-friendliness as well as differentiation. No more 'Windows-like' or 'Mac-like', no more Mr. Nice Guy. Instead, something new, different, and exciting!

Nezbit wrote:
I first tried Ubuntu in 2004 shortly after its first official release. I loved the idea of Linux but it was beyond my limited computer knowledge at the time. I experimented with it off and on over the years, and even made it my main OS a couple of times, dual booting with Windows. Changes in the kernel, lack of drivers, and updates making my system unusable eventually caused me to go back to Windows as my only OS. Maybe next year when I build a new computer, I will use this one for Linux. For now I really have come to like Windows 10.
Ooh, yes, I remember Ubuntu first coming onto the scene - tried it out for a time back then but didn't meet enough of my needs just yet then. However, I thought it was exciting and a bit of a breeze of fresh air. I originally first tried Linux back around 95 or 96, with Slackware. Nightmare - took me a week to set up a WM/DE, and the whole thing was unstable as hell. Fortunately, I had Solaris and OS/2 Warp on the same machine - my first self-built x86 PC - as well as still Openstep 4. (And I still had a few Amigas and NeXT boxes back then.) Anyway, Slackware had to go fairly soon (and made way for BeOS IIRC - load of mainly derivative shite really, basically, but some interesting bits) but I always kept an eye on the Linux scene. I then came back to Ubuntu permanently with 16.04 LTS dual-booting with XP - that old laptop didn't support later Windows versions - and within maybe six months joined by Fedora. Anyway, Ubuntu's now my main OS on all machines. Never really given me any problems in re: upsetting Windblows, touch wood.

Nezbit wrote:
As for modifying someone else’s themes, icons, wallpaper, etc, I sure am guilty of that. I have all the talent of a four year old when it comes to artistic creation, but I have become fairly skilled in the use of paint.net to modify the work of others for my personal use. I do always acknowledge and link to the original author if I post something on a website. It is their creation and they deserve the credit. Years of exploring DeviantArt has shown me that most authors don’t seem to mind someone modifying their work as long as they are recognized as the original author and no one else profits from it. Sometimes I think that I enjoy changing my desktop more than I enjoy using the computer itself. I guess I need to get a life.
LOL! I can't say I 'enjoy' using a computer per se, it's just a tool, or rather, a toolbox, to me, but I'd certainly say that generally I find Ubuntu a joy to use, and Fedora isn't bad either, albeit somewhat more 'serious' in tone somehow.
As for modifying other people's themes, I don't have a problem with that per se as long as the original creators don't mind - curious that they don't, I always thought - and as long as it doesn't involve genuine art and outstanding original design, which it very rarely gets near. (If it did, the creator wouldn't want it messed about with and wouldn't put it 'out there'.

) Mind you, there's at least one exception out there who is capable of some good design, user Picco14 (hope I got the name right!). So at least I've ended with something positive.
